<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shoot Pictures Remotely With Your Canon DSLR by Using the DSLR Remote iPhone App</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gsmdome.com/mobile-software/shoot-pictures-remotely-with-your-canon-dslr-by-using-the-dslr-remote-iphone-app_6371/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gsmdome.com/mobile-software/shoot-pictures-remotely-with-your-canon-dslr-by-using-the-dslr-remote-iphone-app_6371</link>
	<description>The mobile news factory!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: panini </title>
		<link>http://www.gsmdome.com/mobile-software/shoot-pictures-remotely-with-your-canon-dslr-by-using-the-dslr-remote-iphone-app_6371/comment-page-1#comment-1998</link>
		<dc:creator>panini </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsmdome.com/?p=6371#comment-1998</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drumsergeant</title>
		<link>http://www.gsmdome.com/mobile-software/shoot-pictures-remotely-with-your-canon-dslr-by-using-the-dslr-remote-iphone-app_6371/comment-page-1#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>drumsergeant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gsmdome.com/?p=6371#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>Just Curious. Couldn&#039;t one use a WIFI router to interface the remote to your camera. That is, connect the router (much less expensive and smaller than a laptop) to the camera with the USB cable? That would mean that the camera/router setup would do away with the need for a laptop and limits of the length of the USB cable/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just Curious. Couldn&#39;t one use a WIFI router to interface the remote to your camera. That is, connect the router (much less expensive and smaller than a laptop) to the camera with the USB cable? That would mean that the camera/router setup would do away with the need for a laptop and limits of the length of the USB cable/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

